Inconsistent Facts in Pittsburgh Synagogue Massacre
People are easiest manipulated when emotions run high
I happened across some interesting information regarding Robert Bowers, the alleged gunmen in the horrific attack on the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, that seems important. While the mainstream media is twisting this horrific event into a witch hunt against upstart social media outlet, Gab.com, The Political News Report is going to ask uncomfortable questions.
As I alluded to in my recent post regarding the targeting of Democratic Party and associated people with a bomb scare just a few days ago, people do not question authority during times of crisis. This is the very reason why false flag operations exist and it is the very reason why uncomfortable questions must be asked and official narratives questioned. It’s too late to ask questions when your right to do so has been legislated away.
Suspicious facts?
Rabbi Berkun stayed home
I’m not saying that the massacre at the Tree of Life synagogue was a false flag event. But there are some things about this story that beg further investigation. One thing I’ve seen posted is the fact that a former Rabbi, Alvin Berkun, who typically would have been at synagogue at the time of the shooting, stayed home because his wife asked him not to go.
But it doesn’t take a lot of research to discover that Rabbi Berkun’s wife didn’t just ask him to stay home. Rabbi Berkun stayed home because his wife was ill. That’s a perfectly legitimate explanation for his absence from the synagogue at the time of the massacre. So please, if you’ve heard somebody try to bring this one up as suggest this was as false flag, don’t fall for the failed logic and the poor research.
The @MarkSchultzy tweet
One thing that is peculiar is one of Robert Bower’s posts on Gab.com. It appears to be a repost of a tweet by a purported Jew named Mark Schultz (@MarkSchultzy) that says “Jews love persecution. It justifies offense and reinforces the need for strength in numbers to divide and conquer gentiles (non-jews)”. I did not see the actual Gab post because Robert Bower’s Gab page has been taken down by Gab.com. But I was able to find an archived copy of Bower’s Gab.com page from October 27, 2018 and the post appears there.
What I wasn’t able to find was the original tweet by @MarkSchultzy. According to the archived copy of Bower’s Gab.com page, that Jewish-supremacist sounding tweet by @MarkSchultzy quoted above was dated August 15, 2018. But when you try to find @MarkSchultzy’s older tweets, there’s a huge gap between April 16, 2015 and October 20, 2018. @MarkSchultzy’s October 20, 2018 tweet states:
I just activated @Tweet_Delete on my account to automatically delete my old tweets (https://t.co/0W7gBlp3Ph)!
— Mark Schultz (@MarkSchultzy) October 21, 2018
I’ve got to admit it’s kind of odd that @MarkSchultzy just happened to delete about three years of his own tweets just three days before Mark Bowers (allegedly) slaughtered 11 innocent Jews. Three years of tweets that appears to have included a very disturbing tweet that was immortalized on Mike Bowers’ Gab page. But what else is odd is that @MarkSchultzy’s Twitter posts seem to be filled with the kind of stuff that would get @MarkSchultzy labeled as a conspiracy theorist and possibly de-platformed from Twitter. Here’s an example:
Think we need alien technology to give the world free energy? Think again. Tesla already created one. It would have worked but the critical details were stolen from his safe when he died. pic.twitter.com/EUAfp1dTAy
— Mark Schultz (@MarkSchultzy) October 24, 2018
And here’s another:
You know why there’s only 2 parties in the most powerful nation on earth. The FED stockholders rule us and 2 is the least # of options they give so we perceive we have a choice. WE DON’T.
— Mark Schultz (@MarkSchultzy) October 23, 2018
What’s the take away? While @MarkSchultzy’s deletion of three years of his tweets, possibly including a very ugly tweet, seems a bit odd, it seems to me that there’s a good chance @MarkSchultzy was being sarcastic in that tweet that. It just doesn’t match the anti-establishment tone that’s is expressed by the @MarkSchultzy Twitter account.
The attack on Gab.com
I know I started this post talking about false flag events. Sorry to disappoint if that’s what you were looking for. But there does appear to be mass manipulation going on, a conspiracy, if you will, to undermine upstart social media platform Gab.com. This social media site, which guarantees free speech, experienced an upsurge in traffic in the wake of the recent silencing of non-mainstream voices by social media giants like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.
The centralization of pre-Internet media – television, radio and newsprint – into fewer and fewer hands over the last few decades helped to drive the market shift towards open Internet platforms like YouTube and Facebook. Not everybody may have understood that ownership of major media had become dominated by handful of companies by the early 2000s, but they could tell they weren’t getting the full picture and they turned to new news sources on the Internet.
Story after story labels Gab.com as “far-right” or “fringe”, trying to smear the site for not taking action against Robert Bowers. Now the site is facing threats from payment providers and hosting providers, such as PayPal and Microsoft. All the while, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube all have records of allowing their users to post beheadings and calls for violence against people, such as the murder of President Trump, yet face no scrutiny over such content.
Since the 2016 presidential election, the social media giants have made it clear that they see the world a certain way and, in conjunction with pre-Internet media outlets, intend to silence anyone who challenges that view. Gab.com’s recent rise in popularity is the market’s response to such tyranny and now big media is shamelessly trying to capitalize on public outrage over this horrendous event in Pittsburgh in order to paint Gab.com as a fringe, extremist social media hub. They have to do that now before too many people give Gab.com’s free speech platform a try.
Will they succeed in shutting down Gab.com or will they simply drive the market to other platforms that guarantee free speech?
The Political New Report was created in the interests of informing the public and we need your help. Please share this article and website on social media, and also like and subscribe so other like-minded people can find this content. If you found this content valuable, consider buying us a cup of coffee!
