Tuesday, April 23, 2024
BLOGPNR Original Content

About That Trump Impeachment

About That Trump Impeachment

BEGIN VIDEO TRANSCRIPT

Welcome to The Political News Report, PoliticalNewsReport.com . . .

In this video we’re talking about the impeachment of President Trump.

But before we talk about that, I would like to take a moment to say thank you to the new subscribers that joined on BitChute and YouTube over the past few days. Friends, if you find value in this content click the thumbs up button, click the subscribe button and also share on social media.

Now on to the topic of this video…

“Ukrainegate”

As you should be well aware by now, the Democrats have doubled-down on the debunked Russiagate scandal and are trying to revive it through “Ukrainegate”. A few days ago, they took this preposterous story and ran with it all the way to launching an impeachment inquiry against President Trump. But, just like Russiagate, Ukrainegate has some big problems. Problems which, surprise, surprise, surprise, the Democrats and the mainstream media are failing to mention.

What am I talking about?

The Ukrainians weren’t made aware that the assistance was being delayed/reviewed until more than one month after the call. – Kenneth Vogel of The New York Times

Well, in our first story today, from ZeroHedge, September 28, 2019, “Quid Pro Nope: Ukraine Reportedly Had No Idea About Trump Withholding $400 Million Until Month After Call”:

A key element of the impeachment push against President Trump is the assertion that he withheld nearly $400 million in US military aid to Ukraine before ‘pressuring’ President Volodomyr Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

While Trump says he stalled the aid to investigate whether the new administration [in Ukraine] was just as corrupt as the last one, Democrats and their MSM lapdogs have been making the case that the aid and the request to investigate Biden are linked.

But according to the New York Times‘ own Kenneth Vogel, “The Ukrainians weren’t made aware that the assistance was being delayed/reviewed until more than one month after the call.” At least, that’s what he said in a tweet on the subject on Wednesday in response to MSNBC’s Rick Tyler, who asked why the $400 million in aid wasn’t the top priority of the call.

The Bidens’ Ukrainegate

But that’s not all, ladies and gentlemen. From The Hill, back in April of this year, 2019, “Joe Biden’s 2020 Ukrainian nightmare: a closed probe is revived”. And I have to credit ZeroHedge for linking to this article. Neither of them are very long and they’re both worth your time to read.

But basically what [The Hill] story says is that former Vice President Joe Biden told an audience at the Council on Foreign Relations that he threatened to withhold $ 1 billion in loan guarantees to Ukraine if they didn’t fire their top prosecutor. A video of Biden’s appearance at the CFR is linked in both of these stories and I will also provide a link in the show notes [below] so you can watch it yourself.

The prosecutor [Biden] got fired was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings that employed Biden’s younger son, Hunter, as a board member. – The Hill

But according to The Hill, Ukrainian officials said that Biden left one very important fact out of his story that he told his CFR audience. Shokin, the prosecutor that was fired, was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings that employed Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, as a board member.

The Hill also reports in this story that Hunter’s U.S.-based firm, Rosemont Seneca Partners LLC, received regular transfers into one of its accounts of more than $166,000 a month from Burisma from spring 2014 through fall 2015, when Vice President Joe Biden was the main U.S. official dealing with Ukraine and its tense relations with Russia.

So, in other words, not only does the evidence contradict the Democrats’ narrative that Trump threatened to hold the $400 million from Ukraine unless they opened unless they opened an investigation on Joe and Hunter Biden, it also provides probable cause for an investigation into Joe Biden for doing the very thing that the Democrats appear to be falsely accusing Trump of doing!

Russiagate, Ukrainegate, Floridagate?

Bondi asked for the contribution before publicly announcing she would join a New York state suit against Trump U[niversity]. Four days later, she received a check from Trump’s foundation. Bondi subsequently announced she was no longer suing Trump, citing insufficient grounds to proceed.

With that said, our third story, “Florida attorney general dropped Trump U fraud suit right after GOP candidate gave her $25,000”. This is from RawStory.com, going back to June 7, 2016, before the election of Trump to the presidency. Again, this isn’t very long and worth your time.

Florida’s Republican attorney general, Pam Bondi, personally asked Donald Trump for a campaign contribution before dropping out of a lawsuit charging Trump University with fraud…

Bondi asked for the contribution before publicly announcing she would join a New York state suit against Trump U[niversity]. Four days later, she received a check from Trump’s foundation. Bondi subsequently announced she was no longer suing Trump, citing insufficient grounds to proceed.

The check was in the amount of $25,000, and [according to RawStory] the donation was in violation of rules governing political activities by charities.

This story also goes into the fact that all of the complaints that provided more than enough justification for the Florida Attorney General to pursue the suit, despite her claim otherwise.

Ladies and gentlemen, a first-year law student could get an indictment against Trump on those facts. So why have the Democrats gone to the lengths they have pursuing fabricated stories like Russiagate and now Ukrainegate?

Why follow up the failed Russiagate narrative by doubling-down and fabricating another story about Ukraine. Why are Democrats going to these lengths of discrediting themselves when this golden nugget, this silver bullet has been laying there out in the open since before the 2016 election? And why does the mainstream press continue to ignore this story?

Well Joe Biden, aside from being a crusty, corrupt old gasbag, has a Ukraine problem as previously mentioned. And there is one theory out there that does make some sense – that perhaps the Democrats, or at least a faction in the Democratic Party, are not only trying to take down Trump, but they’re also trying to get rid of Biden to make room for a more viable candidate.

To me that does make sense because if the Democrats nominate Joe Biden as their presidential candidate, then they will essentially be repeating that “winning” strategy from 2016, putting up a crusty piece of corruption that’s been circling the rim of the DC Beltway for decades, like they did with Hillary Clinton. And we all know how that turned out.

Controlled Opposition?

However if I may offer my own humble observation, I believe this is part of a divide-and-conquer strategy that the people that the Trumps and the Bidens, and the Clintons and the Obamas and the Bushes really answer to. And the purpose is to keep “we the people” divided and conquered.

Because if they can keep you caught up in the left versus right, Democrat versus Republican dichotomy, you’ll never bother to consider that the same hands that pull the Democrats’ strings are the same hands that pull the Republicans’ strings.

I did a video on my theory. It’s called “Controlled Opposition” and if you’ve stuck around this long you might just find it worth another ten or so minutes of your time. It will also be linked in the show notes.

Also, if you’ve stuck around this long, then click that thumbs up button and subscribe if you haven’t already.
Thanks for watching, thanks for listening and remember, the political is personal.

END VIDEO TRANSCRIPT

Resource Links:

Fatih Siyasi

Engaged in counter-propaganda related work.